Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 77
Filter
1.
researchsquare; 2024.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE | ID: ppzbmed-10.21203.rs.3.rs-3886091.v1

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Studies have demonstrated important changes in the seasonality of pediatric respiratory illnesses since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to describe the epidemiology of childhood wheezing episodes before and after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in relation to their potentially associated environmental triggers. Methods: Files of all children treated with salbutamol for a wheezing episode in September and October 2019, 2020 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Infection epidemiology, daily concentrations of air pollutants (NO2, O3, PM10 and PM2.5) and fungal spores were collected over the same time period. Results: In 2021, 298 episodes of wheezing were observed compared to 111 in 2020 and 86 in 2019 (p<0.001). Compared to 2019, children with wheezing in 2021 were significantly older (p<0.001), less likely to have a history of recurrent wheezing (p<0.001) and required less hospitalization (p=0.034). Adenovirus and SARS-CoV-2 were more prevalent in 2021 as compared to 2019 (p<0.001). The concentration of PM10, PM2.5 and O3 was higher in 2021, as compared to both 2019 and 2020 (p<0.001) while the concentration of NO2 and airborne spores was lower in 2021 compared to 2019 (p<0.0001). Conclusion: A threefold increase in wheezing episodes was observed in the autumn post-COVID (2021) compared to pre-COVID (2019) together with a significant increase in some viruses and most air pollutants. We hypothesize that this abnormal surge may be related to the release of restrictions with rapid spread of viruses in children who were exposed to high levels of air pollution.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Respiratory Sounds
2.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 51(3): 99-107, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2325362

ABSTRACT

Bronchiolitis is the most common respiratory infection leading to hospitalization and constitutes a significant healthcare burden. The two main viral agents causing bronchiolitis, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and rhinovirus (RV), have distinct cytopathic, immune response, and clinical characteristics. Different approaches have been suggested for subtyping bronchiolitis based on viral etiology, atopic status, transcriptome profiles in blood, airway metabolome, lipidomic data, and airway microbiota. The highest risk of asthma at school age has been in a subgroup of bronchiolitis characterized by older age, high prevalence of RV infection, previous breathing problems, and/or eczema. Regarding solely viral etiology, RV-bronchiolitis in infancy has been linked to a nearly three times higher risk of developing asthma than RSV-bronchiolitis. Although treatment with betamimetics and systemic corticosteroids has been found ineffective in bronchiolitis overall, it can be beneficial for infants with severe RV bronchiolitis. Thus, there is a need to develop a more individualized therapeutic approach for bronchiolitis and follow-up strategies for infants at higher risk of asthma in the future perspective.


Subject(s)
Asthma , Bronchiolitis, Viral , Bronchiolitis , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections , Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Human , Infant , Humans , Bronchiolitis/epidemiology , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/epidemiology , Asthma/epidemiology , Asthma/prevention & control , Asthma/etiology , Hospitalization , Respiratory Sounds/etiology
3.
J Med Internet Res ; 25: e44804, 2023 05 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2315173

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To date, performance comparisons between men and machines have been carried out in many health domains. Yet machine learning (ML) models and human performance comparisons in audio-based respiratory diagnosis remain largely unexplored. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to compare human clinicians and an ML model in predicting COVID-19 from respiratory sound recordings. METHODS: In this study, we compared human clinicians and an ML model in predicting COVID-19 from respiratory sound recordings. Prediction performance on 24 audio samples (12 tested positive) made by 36 clinicians with experience in treating COVID-19 or other respiratory illnesses was compared with predictions made by an ML model trained on 1162 samples. Each sample consisted of voice, cough, and breathing sound recordings from 1 subject, and the length of each sample was around 20 seconds. We also investigated whether combining the predictions of the model and human experts could further enhance the performance in terms of both accuracy and confidence. RESULTS: The ML model outperformed the clinicians, yielding a sensitivity of 0.75 and a specificity of 0.83, whereas the best performance achieved by the clinicians was 0.67 in terms of sensitivity and 0.75 in terms of specificity. Integrating the clinicians' and the model's predictions, however, could enhance performance further, achieving a sensitivity of 0.83 and a specificity of 0.92. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the clinicians and the ML model could make better clinical decisions via a cooperative approach and achieve higher confidence in audio-based respiratory diagnosis.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Respiratory Sounds , Respiratory Tract Diseases , Humans , Male , COVID-19/diagnosis , Machine Learning , Physicians , Respiratory Tract Diseases/diagnosis , Deep Learning
4.
PLoS One ; 18(3): e0282337, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2267593

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The study aimed to evaluate visualization-based training's effects on lung auscultation during clinical clerkship (CC) in the Department of Respiratory Medicine on student skills and confidence. METHODS: The study period was December 2020-November 2021. Overall, 65 students attended a lecture on lung auscultation featuring a simulator (Mr. Lung™). Among them, 35 (visualization group) received additional training wherein they were asked to mentally visualize lung sounds using a graphical visualized lung sounds diagram as an example. All students answered questions on their self-efficacy regarding lung auscultation before and after four weeks of CC. They also took a lung auscultation test with the simulator at the beginning of CC (pre-test) and on the last day of the third week (post-test) (maximum score: 25). We compared the answers in the questionnaire and the test scores between the visualization group and students who only attended the lecture (control group, n = 30). The Wilcoxon signed-rank test and analysis of covariance were used to compare the answers to the questionnaire about confidence in lung auscultation and the scores of the lung auscultation tests before and after the training. RESULTS: Confidence in auscultation of lung sounds significantly increased in both groups (five-point Likert scale, visualization group: pre-questionnaire median 1 [Interquartile range 1] to post-questionnaire 3 [1], p<0.001; control group: 2 [1] to 3 [1], p<0.001) and was significantly higher in the visualization than in the control group. Test scores increased in both groups (visualization group: pre-test 11 [2] to post-test 15 [4], p<0.001; control group: 11 [5] to 14 [4], p<0.001). However, there were no differences between both groups' pre and post-tests scores (p = 0.623). CONCLUSION: Visualizing lung sounds may increase medical students' confidence in their lung auscultation skills; this may reduce their resistance to lung auscultation and encourage the repeated auscultation necessary to further improve their long-term auscultation abilities.


Subject(s)
Clinical Clerkship , Students, Medical , Humans , Respiratory Sounds , Auscultation , Lung , Clinical Competence , Heart Auscultation
6.
Tomography ; 9(2): 706-716, 2023 03 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2282309

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether changes in repeated lung ultrasound (LUS) or chest X-ray (CXR) of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients can predict the development of severe disease and the need for treatment in the intensive care unit (ICU). In this prospective monocentric study, COVID-19 patients received standardized LUS and CXR at day 1, 3 and 5. Scores for changes in LUS (LUS score) and CXR (RALE and M-RALE) were calculated and compared. Intra-class correlation was calculated for two readers of CXR and ROC analysis to evaluate the best discriminator for the need for ICU treatment. A total of 30 patients were analyzed, 26 patients with follow-up LUS and CXR. Increase in M-RALE between baseline and follow-up 1 was significantly higher in patients with need for ICU treatment in the further hospital stay (p = 0.008). Both RALE and M-RALE significantly correlated with LUS score (r = 0.5, p < 0.0001). ROC curves with need for ICU treatment as separator were not significantly different for changes in M-RALE (AUC: 0.87) and LUS score (AUC: 0.79), both being good discriminators. ICC was moderate for RALE (0.56) and substantial for M-RALE (0.74). The present study demonstrates that both follow-up LUS and CXR are powerful tools to track the evolution of COVID-19, and can be used equally as predictors for the need for ICU treatment.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , Prospective Studies , Respiratory Sounds , X-Rays , Lung/diagnostic imaging
7.
J Emerg Med ; 64(2): 195-199, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2273689

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 has a predilection for the upper airways, causing symptoms such as sore throat, hoarse voice, and stridor. OBJECTIVE: We describe a series of children with COVID-19-associated croup in an urban multicenter hospital system. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of children ≤18 years of age presenting to the emergency department during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data were extracted from an institutional data repository comprised of all patients who were tested for SARS-CoV-2. We included patients with a croup diagnosis by International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision code and a positive SARS-CoV-2 test within 3 days of presentation. We compared demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes for patients presenting during a pre-Omicron period (March 1, 2020-December 1, 2021) to the Omicron wave (December 2, 2021-February 15, 2022). RESULTS: We identified 67 children with croup, 10 (15%) pre-Omicron and 57 (85%) during the Omicron wave. The prevalence of croup among SARS-CoV-2-positive children increased by a factor of 5.8 (95% confidence interval 3.0-11.4) during the Omicron wave compared to prior. More patients were ≥6 years of age in the Omicron wave than prior (19% vs. 0%). The majority were not hospitalized (77%). More patients ≥6 years of age received epinephrine therapy for croup during the Omicron wave (73% vs. 35%). Most patients ≥6 years of age had no croup history (64%) and only 45% were vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. CONCLUSION: Croup was prevalent during the Omicron wave, atypically affecting patients ≥6 years of age. COVID-19-associated croup should be added to the differential diagnosis of children with stridor, regardless of age. © 2022 Elsevier Inc.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Croup , Respiratory Tract Infections , Humans , Child , SARS-CoV-2 , New York City , Cross-Sectional Studies , Pandemics , Respiratory Sounds
8.
Respir Care ; 68(4): 520-523, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2249426

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Vocal cord dysfunction is an upper-airway disorder characterized by exaggerated and transient glottic constriction causing respiratory and laryngeal symptoms. Common presentation is with inspiratory stridor often in the context of emotional stress and anxiety. Other symptoms include wheezing (which may be on inspiration), frequent cough, choking sensation, or throat and chest tightness. This is seen commonly in teenagers, particularly in adolescent females. The COVID-19 pandemic has been a trigger for anxiety and stress with an increase in psychosomatic illness. Our objective was to find out if the incidence of vocal cord dysfunction increased during COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of all the subjects with a new diagnosis of vocal cord dysfunction who were seen at the out-patient pulmonary practice at our children's hospital between January 2019-December 2020. RESULTS: The incidence of vocal cord dysfunction in 2019 was found to be 5.2%, (41/786 subjects seen) compared to 10.3% (47/457 subjects seen) in 2020, which is a nearly 100% increase in incidence (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: It is important to recognize that vocal cord dysfunction has increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. In particular, physicians treating pediatric patients, as well as respiratory therapists, should be aware of this diagnosis. It is imperative to avoid unnecessary intubations and treatments with bronchodilators and corticosteroids as opposed to behavioral and speech training to learn effective voluntary control over the muscles of inspiration and the vocal cords.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Vocal Cord Dysfunction , Female , Adolescent , Humans , Child , Retrospective Studies , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/complications , Vocal Cord Dysfunction/epidemiology , Vocal Cord Dysfunction/etiology , Vocal Cord Dysfunction/diagnosis , Vocal Cords , Respiratory Sounds/etiology
9.
Front Public Health ; 11: 1043696, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2249102

ABSTRACT

Background: Vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is the most effective way to end the pandemic. Any development of adverse events (AEs) from various vaccines should be reported. We therefore aimed to explore major and minor AEs among vaccinated individuals in Saudi Arabia. Methods: This is a nationwide report based on the Saudi Arabian Ministry of Health (MOH) registry. It included those who received COVID-19 vaccines from 17th December 2020 to 31st December 2021. The study included spontaneous self-reported adverse effects to COVID-19 vaccines where the study participants used a governmental mobile app (Sehhaty) to report their AEs following vaccination using a checklist option that included a selection of side-effects. The primary outcome was to determine AEs reported within 14 days of vaccination which included injection site itching, pain, reaction, redness, swelling, anxiety, dizziness, fever, headache, hoarseness, itchiness, loss of consciousness, nausea, heartburn, sleep disruption, fatigue, seizures, anaphylaxis, shortness of breath, wheezing, swelling of lips, face, and throat, loss of consciousness, and admissions into the intensive care unit (ICU). Results: The study included a total number of 28,031 individuals who reported 71,480 adverse events (AEs); which were further classified into minor and major adverse events including ICU admissions post vaccination. Of the reported AEs, 38,309 (53. 6%) side-effects were reported following Pfizer-BioNTech, 32,223 (45%) following Oxford-AstraZeneca, and 948 (1.3%) following Moderna. The following reported AEs were statistically significant between the different vaccine types: shortness of breath\difficulty of breathing, dizziness, fever above 39°C, headache, hoarseness, injection site reactions, itchiness, nausea, sleep disruption, fatigue, wheezing, swelling of lips/face and\or throat, and loss of consciousness (p-value < 0.05). Fever and seizure were the only statistically significant AEs amongst the number of vaccine doses received (p-value < 0.05). Ten ICU admissions were reported in the 14 days observation period post-COVID-19 vaccination with the following diagnoses: acute myocardial infarction, pneumonia, atherosclerosis, acute respiratory failure, intracranial hemorrhage, grand mal seizure, Guillain-Barré syndrome, abnormal blood gas levels, and septic shock. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the most prevalent SARS-CoV-2 vaccine side-effects among adults in Saudi Arabia were mild in nature. This information will help reduce vaccine hesitancy and encourage further mass vaccination to combat the COVID-19 pandemic, especially as booster doses are now available. Further studies are warranted to obtain a better understanding of the association between risk factors and the experiencing of side-effects post vaccination.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Adult , Humans , Saudi Arabia , Self Report , Dizziness , Hoarseness , Pandemics , Respiratory Sounds , SARS-CoV-2 , Dyspnea , Unconsciousness
10.
J Paediatr Child Health ; 58(9): 1635-1641, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2276186

ABSTRACT

AIM: The rapid spread of a novel human coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 led to drastic measures world-wide. Most countries were forced to declare a national lockdown. We studied the effect of lockdown measures on the level of asthma control and maintenance treatment in children with recurrent wheezing and asthma during the first wave of COVID-19 in Spain. METHODS: We analysed children with recurrent wheezing or asthma before and after the implementation of the lockdown, by using a questionnaire aimed to examine pre-existing respiratory disorders, step treatment and level of asthma control before/after lockdown, COVID history and laboratory testing including IgG SARS-CoV-2. RESULTS: We enrolled 475 asthmatic and pre-school wheezers (60.6% males), mean age 5.6 years. There were no differences in asthma treatment comparing both periods: 81.7% maintained the same treatment (P = 0.103). According to child asthma-control questionnaire, 87.7% remained well controlled during confinement. Nearly, a third of children (34.9%) needed reliever treatment, mainly in older children. Determination of IgG SARS-CoV-2 was performed in 233 children (49.1%) of whom 17 (7.3%) tested positive. Seven patients positive to IgG SARS-CoV-2 were assisted in the emergency department and two required hospital admission. CONCLUSIONS: During COVID-19 lockdown in Spain, most children with recurrent wheezing and asthma remained well controlled from their underlying disease and did not modify greatly their maintenance treatments. Unexpectedly, we also observed that those children who tested positive to SARS-CoV-2 IgG showed a significant increase in paediatric hospital admissions and attendances to urgent care settings.


Subject(s)
Asthma , COVID-19 , Asthma/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Communicable Disease Control , Female , Humans , Immunoglobulin G , Male , Respiratory Sounds , SARS-CoV-2 , Spain/epidemiology
11.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 11(3): 825-835.e3, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2246190

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Post-viral respiratory symptoms are common among patients with asthma. Respiratory symptoms after acute COVID-19 are widely reported in the general population, but large-scale studies identifying symptom risk for patients with asthma are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To identify and compare risk for post-acute COVID-19 respiratory symptoms in patients with and without asthma. METHODS: This retrospective, observational cohort study included COVID-19-positive patients between March 4, 2020, and January 20, 2021, with up to 180 days of health care follow-up in a health care system in the Northeastern United States. Respiratory symptoms recorded in clinical notes from days 28 to 180 after COVID-19 diagnosis were extracted using natural language processing. Cohorts were stratified by hospitalization status during the acute COVID-19 period. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to compare symptoms among patients with and without asthma adjusting for demographic and clinical confounders. RESULTS: Among 31,084 eligible patients with COVID-19, 2863 (9.2%) had hospitalization during the acute COVID-19 period; 4049 (13.0%) had a history of asthma, accounting for 13.8% of hospitalized and 12.9% of nonhospitalized patients. In the post-acute COVID-19 period, patients with asthma had significantly higher risk of shortness of breath, cough, bronchospasm, and wheezing than patients without an asthma history. Incident respiratory symptoms of bronchospasm and wheezing were also higher in patients with asthma. Patients with asthma who had not been hospitalized during acute COVID-19 had additionally higher risk of cough, abnormal breathing, sputum changes, and a wider range of incident respiratory symptoms. CONCLUSION: Patients with asthma may have an under-recognized burden of respiratory symptoms after COVID-19 warranting increased awareness and monitoring in this population.


Subject(s)
Asthma , Bronchial Spasm , COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 Testing , Retrospective Studies , Electronic Health Records , Cough , Respiratory Sounds , Asthma/epidemiology , Hospitalization
12.
Acta Biomed ; 94(1): e2023032, 2023 02 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2244953

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIM: During the 2020 and 2021 Italian COVID-19 pandemic social restrictions and strict hygiene measures were recommended to limit the spread of SARS-CoV-2. We aimed to assess whether rates of respiratory infections and wheezing in preterm infants have changed during the pandemic. METHODS: Single center, retrospective study. Preterm infants in the first 6 months of life discharged home prior to (Period 1, January 2017 - December 2019) or during the pandemic (Period 2, January 2020 - March 2021) were compared. Rates of respiratory infection and wheezing in preterm infants with or without bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BDP) were assessed. RESULTS: During period 2 premature infants had lower rates of respiratory infections (36 out of 55 in Period 1 vs 11 out of 28 in Period 2, P=0.023) and wheezing (20 out of 55 in Period 1 vs 1 out of 28 in Period 2, P=0.001). This difference remained significant when infants with BPD (all grades) were analyzed separately (respiratory infections 26 out of 40 in Period 1 vs 7 out of 24 in Period 2, P=0.005; wheezing 16 out of 40 in Period 1 vs 1 out of 24 in Period 2, P=0.001). In contrast, respiratory infections and wheezing in preterm infants without BPD did not change after pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: Episodes of respiratory infections and wheezing among preterm infants were reduced during pandemic. We highlight the importance of proper family education for preventing respiratory tract infections in preterm infants with BPD, beyond the extraordinary conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Respiratory Tract Infections , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Infant, Premature , Retrospective Studies , Respiratory Sounds , Pandemics/prevention & control , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Respiratory Tract Infections/prevention & control
13.
BMJ Open ; 13(1): e066626, 2023 01 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2193797

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To reliably quantify the radiographic severity of COVID-19 pneumonia with the Radiographic Assessment of Lung Edema (RALE) score on clinical chest X-rays among inpatients and examine the prognostic value of baseline RALE scores on COVID-19 clinical outcomes. SETTING: Hospitalised patients with COVID-19 in dedicated wards and intensive care units from two different hospital systems. PARTICIPANTS: 425 patients with COVID-19 in a discovery data set and 415 patients in a validation data set. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: We measured inter-rater reliability for RALE score annotations by different reviewers and examined for associations of consensus RALE scores with the level of respiratory support, demographics, physiologic variables, applied therapies, plasma host-response biomarkers, SARS-CoV-2 RNA load and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Inter-rater agreement for RALE scores improved from fair to excellent following reviewer training and feedback (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.85 vs 0.93, respectively). In the discovery cohort, the required level of respiratory support at the time of CXR acquisition (supplemental oxygen or non-invasive ventilation (n=178); invasive-mechanical ventilation (n=234), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (n=13)) was significantly associated with RALE scores (median (IQR): 20.0 (14.1-26.7), 26.0 (20.5-34.0) and 44.5 (34.5-48.0), respectively, p<0.0001). Among invasively ventilated patients, RALE scores were significantly associated with worse respiratory mechanics (plateau and driving pressure) and gas exchange metrics (PaO2/FiO2 and ventilatory ratio), as well as higher plasma levels of IL-6, soluble receptor of advanced glycation end-products and soluble tumour necrosis factor receptor 1 (p<0.05). RALE scores were independently associated with 90-day survival in a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model (adjusted HR 1.04 (1.02-1.07), p=0.002). We replicated the significant associations of RALE scores with baseline disease severity and mortality in the independent validation data set. CONCLUSIONS: With a reproducible method to measure radiographic severity in COVID-19, we found significant associations with clinical and physiologic severity, host inflammation and clinical outcomes. The incorporation of radiographic severity assessments in clinical decision-making may provide important guidance for prognostication and treatment allocation in COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pulmonary Edema , Humans , COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , Prognosis , SARS-CoV-2 , Inpatients , Reproducibility of Results , RNA, Viral , Respiratory Sounds , Pulmonary Edema/diagnostic imaging , Cohort Studies , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Edema , Respiration, Artificial
14.
Sensors (Basel) ; 22(23)2022 Dec 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2163568

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has led to countless deaths and widespread global disruptions. Acoustic-based artificial intelligence (AI) tools could provide a simple, scalable, and prompt method to screen for COVID-19 using easily acquirable physiological sounds. These systems have been demonstrated previously and have shown promise but lack robust analysis of their deployment in real-world settings when faced with diverse recording equipment, noise environments, and test subjects. The primary aim of this work is to begin to understand the impacts of these real-world deployment challenges on the system performance. Using Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC) and RelAtive SpecTrAl-Perceptual Linear Prediction (RASTA-PLP) features extracted from cough, speech, and breathing sounds in a crowdsourced dataset, we present a baseline classification system that obtains an average receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC-ROC) of 0.77 when discriminating between COVID-19 and non-COVID subjects. The classifier performance is then evaluated on four additional datasets, resulting in performance variations between 0.64 and 0.87 AUC-ROC, depending on the sound type. By analyzing subsets of the available recordings, it is noted that the system performance degrades with certain recording devices, noise contamination, and with symptom status. Furthermore, performance degrades when a uniform classification threshold from the training data is subsequently used across all datasets. However, the system performance is robust to confounding factors, such as gender, age group, and the presence of other respiratory conditions. Finally, when analyzing multiple speech recordings from the same subjects, the system achieves promising performance with an AUC-ROC of 0.78, though the classification does appear to be impacted by natural speech variations. Overall, the proposed system, and by extension other acoustic-based diagnostic aids in the literature, could provide comparable accuracy to rapid antigen testing but significant deployment challenges need to be understood and addressed prior to clinical use.


Subject(s)
Artificial Intelligence , COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/diagnosis , Acoustics , Sound , Respiratory Sounds
15.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 148(11): 1073-1074, 2022 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2119055

ABSTRACT

A 6-month-old girl presented to the emergency department for evaluation of fever and was noted to have mild inspiratory stridor, which began acutely at 4 months of age without any inciting illness or event. What is your diagnosis?


Subject(s)
Deglutition Disorders , Respiratory Sounds , Humans , Child , Respiratory Sounds/etiology , Deglutition Disorders/diagnosis , Deglutition Disorders/etiology , Neck , Diagnosis, Differential
16.
PLoS One ; 17(7): e0271044, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2039359

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Human rhinovirus is a major cause of acute respiratory infections (ARIs) worldwide. Epidemiological data on human rhinovirus (RV) in Peru is still scarce, as well as its role in respiratory infections in children. Therefore, the aim of this study was to describe the prevalence of rhinovirus and to identify the circulating species in nasopharyngeal swabs from children with acute respiratory infections. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed nasopharyngeal swab samples that were collected from children younger than 17 years old, who had a clinical diagnosis of ARI from the "Hospital Nacional Cayetano Heredia" between May 2009 and December 2010. The original study recruited 767 inpatients with ARI, 559 samples of which were included and analyzed in the current study. Detection of rhinovirus and determination of rhinovirus species were characterized by PCR. RESULTS: Rhinovirus was detected in 42.22% samples (236/559), RV-A was detected in 10.17% (24/236) of the cases, RV-B in 16.53% (39/236), and RV-C in 73.31% (173/236). The age group with the highest number of cases was the 0-5 months group with 45.97%, followed by the 1-5 years group with 25.22%. Most of the positive RV cases, i.e., 86.44% (204/236), were hospitalized. The most common signs and symptoms found in patients who tested positive for RV were cough (72.88%), fever (68.64%), rhinorrhea (68.22%), and respiratory distress (61.44%). Infection with RV-A was associated with wheezing (p = 0.02). Furthermore, RV-C was related to cough (p = 0.01), wheezing (p = 0.002), and conjunctival injection (p = 0.03). A peak in RV-C cases was found in March (32 cases in 2010); June (18 cases in 2009 and 12 cases in 2010), which corresponds to the fall season in Peru; and also November (17 cases in 2009 and 4 cases in 2010), which corresponds to spring. RV-A and RV-B cases were constant throughout the year. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, we found a high prevalence of rhinovirus C infection among pediatric patients with acute respiratory infections in Lima, Peru. This viral infection was more common in children between 0 to 5 months old, and was associated with cough, wheezing, and conjunctival injection. Epidemiological surveillance of this virus should be strengthened/encouraged in Peru to determine its real impact on respiratory infections.


Subject(s)
Enterovirus Infections , Picornaviridae Infections , Respiratory Tract Infections , Adolescent , Child , Cough/complications , Enterovirus Infections/complications , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Peru/epidemiology , Picornaviridae Infections/diagnosis , Picornaviridae Infections/epidemiology , Prevalence , Respiratory Sounds/etiology , Rhinovirus/genetics
17.
J Paediatr Child Health ; 58(10): 1741-1746, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2019512

ABSTRACT

Globally, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the leading cause of bronchiolitis and pneumonia in young children, and the association between severe RSV disease and later recurrent wheeze and asthma is well established. Whilst a causal link between RSV and wheeze/asthma is not yet proven, immunological evidence suggests skewing towards a Th2-type response, and dampening of IFN-γ antiviral immunity during RSV infection underpins airway hyper-reactivity in a subset of susceptible children after RSV infection. Age at primary RSV infection, viral co-infection and genetic influences may act as effect-modifiers. Despite the significant morbidity and mortality burden of RSV disease in children, there is currently no licensed vaccine. Recent advancements in RSV preventatives, including long-acting monoclonal antibodies and maternal vaccinations, show significant promise and we are on the cusp of a new era in RSV prevention. However, the potential impact of RSV preventatives on subsequent wheeze and asthma remains unclear. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and associated public health measures have disrupted the usual seasonality of RSV. Whilst this has posed challenges for health-care services it has also enhanced our understanding of RSV transmission. The near absence of RSV cases during the first year of the pandemic in the context of strict public health measures has provided a rare opportunity to study the impact of delayed age of primary RSV infection on asthma prevalence. In this review, we summarise current understanding of the association between RSV, recurrent wheeze and asthma with a focus on pathophysiology, preventative strategies and future research priorities.


Subject(s)
Asthma , COVID-19 , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections , Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Human , Virus Diseases , Antibodies, Monoclonal , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Asthma/epidemiology , Asthma/etiology , Asthma/prevention & control , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Infant , Pandemics , Respiratory Sounds/etiology , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/epidemiology , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/prevention & control , Virus Diseases/complications
18.
Comput Math Methods Med ; 2022: 5360733, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1986446

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To analyze the application of childlike concept with refined nursing intervention in the treatment of children with severe pneumonia. Methods: 100 cases of children with severe pneumonia admitted to our hospital from June 2019 to June 2021 were selected and divided into the control group and the observation group, in which the control group was given refined nursing care and the observation group was given the childlike concept with refined nursing intervention to compare the treatment effects of patients in both groups. The clinical indexes such as recovery time of body temperature, disappearance time of pulmonary rales, recovery time of heart rate, disappearance time of cough, and hospitalization time, were compared between the two groups. Results: Compared with the control group, the time to recovery of body temperature, time to disappearance of pulmonary rales, time to recovery of heart rate, time to disappearance of cough, and hospitalization time were significantly lower in the observation group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Compared with the control group, the compliance rate of patients in the observation group was significantly lower, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Compared with the control group, the total effective rate of patients in the observation group was significantly higher, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Compared with the control group, the overall satisfaction rate of patients in the observation group was significantly higher, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The results of univariate analysis showed that the differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05) in terms of economic conditions, payment method, child's condition, child's age, comorbid underlying diseases, and nursing care method, and the results of logistic multifactor regression analysis showed that the payment method of self-payment, child's critical condition, and comorbid underlying diseases were the most important factors affecting the anxiety of the family members of children with severe pneumonia. risk factors for the occurrence of anxiety in the families of children with severe pneumonia, and the method of care was a protective factor (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The concept of childlike fun and refined nursing interventions can effectively improve the treatment effect of children with severe pneumonia, improve patients' condition, increase patients' compliance and satisfaction, and reduce the risk of anxiety and other negative emotions of the child's family members.


Subject(s)
Cough , Pneumonia , Child , Family , Hospitalization , Humans , Respiratory Sounds
19.
J Med Virol ; 94(11): 5547-5552, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1981876

ABSTRACT

Rhinoviruses have persisted throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, despite other seasonal respiratory viruses (influenza, parainfluenza, respiratory syncytial virus, adenoviruses, human metapneumovirus) being mostly suppressed by pandemic restrictions, such as masking and other forms of social distancing, especially during the national lockdown periods. Rhinoviruses, as nonenveloped viruses, are known to transmit effectively via the airborne and fomite route, which has allowed infection among children and adults to continue despite pandemic restrictions. Rhinoviruses are also known to cause and exacerbate acute wheezing episodes in children predisposed to this condition. Noninfectious causes such as air pollutants (PM2.5 , PM10 ) can also play a role. In this retrospective ecological study, we demonstrate the correlation between UK national sentinel rhinovirus surveillance, the level of airborne particulates, and the changing patterns of pediatric emergency department presentations for acute wheezing, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic (2018-2021) in a large UK teaching hospital.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Enterovirus Infections , Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Human , Respiratory Tract Infections , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , Child , Communicable Disease Control , Enterovirus Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Pandemics , Respiratory Sounds/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Rhinovirus
20.
PLoS One ; 17(6): e0270111, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1963012

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 prognostic factors include age, sex, comorbidities, laboratory and imaging findings, and time from symptom onset to seeking care. PURPOSE: The study aim was to evaluate indices combining disease severity measures and time from disease onset to predict mortality of COVID-19 patients admitted to the emergency department (ED). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All consecutive COVID-19 patients who underwent both computed tomography (CT) and chest X-ray (CXR) at ED presentation between 27/02/2020 and 13/03/2020 were included. CT visual score of disease extension and CXR Radiographic Assessment of Lung Edema (RALE) score were collected. The CT- and CXR-based scores, C-reactive protein (CRP), and oxygen saturation levels (sO2) were separately combined with time from symptom onset to ED presentation to obtain severity/time indices. Multivariable regression age- and sex-adjusted models without and with severity/time indices were compared. For CXR-RALE, the models were tested in a validation cohort. RESULTS: Of the 308 included patients, 55 (17.9%) died. In multivariable logistic age- and sex-adjusted models for death at 30 days, severity/time indices showed good discrimination ability, higher for imaging than for laboratory measures (AUCCT = 0.92, AUCCXR = 0.90, AUCCRP = 0.88, AUCsO2 = 0.88). AUCCXR was lower in the validation cohort (0.79). The models including severity/time indices performed slightly better than models including measures of disease severity not combined with time and those including the Charlson Comorbidity Index, except for CRP-based models. CONCLUSION: Time from symptom onset to ED admission is a strong prognostic factor and provides added value to the interpretation of imaging and laboratory findings at ED presentation.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , Cohort Studies , Humans , Prognosis , Radiography, Thoracic , Respiratory Sounds , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Severity of Illness Index
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL